Making performance easier to see before review time.
Performance shouldn’t be something people discover at review time.
What was happening
Performance conversations were too reactive. Feedback tended to happen in bursts and managers and employees weren’t always aligned on expectations.
What I found
The issue wasn’t simply the review process. There was a gap between the conversations the business wanted managers to have and what was actually happening between formal review points.
What changed
Monthly performance spot checks, clearer shared definitions of performance, calibration, forward-looking conversations and practical manager tools.
What happened
Of performance ratings sat within the top performance tiers following calibration.
Of team-member insights gathered through retrospectives fed into wider business strategy.
These figures describe the ratings and use of insights in that project. They don’t, by themselves, show that the approach caused better performance.
